Have you ever hit the Send button then immediately said, "oops f**k!!" Well, Gmail offers a way to recall potentially damaging email messages with "Undo Send" — if you're quick enough, that is. Here's how it works.
@scapigliato ho iniziato anche io migrazione dalle #bigtech. Prima proprio #gmail. Ieri sera ho scaricato 20k messaggi su #Thunderbird per poi copiarli sul mio dominio. Ora ho un forward fisso sull account gmail e man mano che arriveranno email andrò a sostituire l'indirizzo. Questa la mia mia tecnica.
"Die betroffenen #Kinder müssen von Rechts wegen in die Schule gehen und dort #Chromebooks ... verwenden, vom E-Mail-Dienst #Gmail über Chat-Dienste und Google Docs bis zum KI-Sprachmodell #Gemini. Opt-outs sind nicht vorgesehen. Die allermeisten dieser Schulkinder sind minderjährig. Für die Verarbeitung...müssten die Erziehungsberechtigten zustimmen; #Google versuche gar nicht erst, deren Zustimmung einzuholen, ...."
#Meta también definió el E2EE de tal manera que el mensaje se cifra desde el emisor hasta ellos, se procesa en texto claro y se vuelve a cifrar para la transmisión al receptor.
No dejes que te engañen con afirmaciones falsas y definiciones erróneas.
#Meta also defined E2EE such that the message is encrypted from the sender to them, processed in clear text and re-encrypted for the transmission to the receiver.
Don't let them fool you with false claims and wrong definitions.
@Wuzzy@cyberplace.social#Gmail is already mostly a spam service. The majority of email my servers get from #Google servers is bog-standard phishing attempts or other forms of scam mail. Its absurd that Google rejects email from legitimate self-hosters because they're supposedly a source of spam mail, but lets their own service spam up the Internet with no restrictions.
Self-host your email, don't give mega-corporations any more power to abuse!
Just to be clear: If #Google decides it’s okay to no longer send non-Gmail users the ACTUAL #email, but only a LINK to some bullshit #proprietary service that you must click to “unlock” the TRUE contents, then Gmail ceases to be an email provider but is merely a spam service which bullies unsuspecting users into using their proprietary crap.
While this seems to be limited to (fake) E2E for now, I’m afraid it could get worse if people do not resist.
Latest issue of my curated #cybersecurity and #infosec list of resources for week #14/2025 is out!
It includes the following and much more:
➝ The European Union (#eu) will invest €1.3 billion in cybersecurity, ➝ #Apple has been fined €150 million by #France's competition authority, ➝ National Security Adviser Michael Waltz and his team used personal #Gmail accounts for government communications, ➝ Surge in Palo Alto Networks Scanner Activity, ➝ Five #VPN apps in the App Store are linked to the Chinese military, ➝ A new security fund opens up to help protect the #Fediverse, ➝ Royal Mail Group suffered a significant #databreach with 144GB of sensitive information stolen
Subscribe to the #infosecMASHUP newsletter to have it piping hot in your inbox every week-end
If you send me an email that requires me to use a stripped down Gmail to read it you can bet I’ll add you to my spam list.
Just another attempt of Google to make email even more proprietary forcing people to use their offering.
Still looking into the claim that workspace admins have access to the encryption keys. Which means we should really talk about the meaning of E2EE… #gmail#google#privacy
NB this functionality is good from a security perspective, but its competitive implications will need to be thought through carefully: “the option to require all external recipients (even if they are Gmail users) to use the restricted version of #Gmail.” #DMCCA#DMA
Secondly, it’s not clear if #gmail is using this workaround just for message recipients who don’t have their own “digital #X509 certificates” to enable message encryption yet (which would be justifiable) or not (which would be an improvement over the status quo, but not genuine #E2EE.)