mamot.fr is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mamot.fr est un serveur Mastodon francophone, géré par La Quadrature du Net.

Server stats:

3.3K
active users

#globalization

6 posts6 participants0 posts today
salix sericea (@Ripple13216)<p>Articles about "Trump is anti-globalization" are everywhere. Their tag line is isn't it great he is taking on problems with globalization, tariffs might be good, actually.</p><p>Framing hardcore imperialism as"anti-globalization" will get centrists or even some "lefties" on board.</p><p>Are the media just bored, looking for "new" angles, or is this a really well run propaganda show? Or a bit of both and things I don't see?</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/trade" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>trade</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/economy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>economy</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/media" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>media</span></a></p>
Miguel Afonso Caetano<p>"The big, long-term question: what does the global trading system look like? The thing to watch for is whether the kind of deals Vietnam and others are making with the US end up destroying the most-favoured-nation principle underlying the World Trade Organization by giving the US special treatment. I’m moderately optimistic on this one. Label these deals as preferential trade agreements (which is pretty dodgy under WTO rules, but there are plenty of weak PTAs about already), recognise that many won’t make much difference to US exports anyway and move on. It strikes me that, if anything, attachment to the multilateral system, particularly in open trading economies like the south-east Asian nations, has increased as a result of the US threatening it. If countries are looking for a framework of international trade law, the WTO provides it. Unfortunately, though, I don’t see much sign that India is going to stop playing its spoiler role and paralysing the negotiations part of the WTO (as the US tried with the dispute settlement system)."</p><p><a href="https://www.ft.com/content/3a6c0561-0628-43e4-86f0-bd3db881667b" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">ft.com/content/3a6c0561-0628-4</span><span class="invisible">3e4-86f0-bd3db881667b</span></a></p><p><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/USA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>USA</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Trump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Trump</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Tariffs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Tariffs</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/TradeWar" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TradeWar</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Protectionism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Protectionism</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/WTO" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WTO</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Globalization</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/FreeTrade" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FreeTrade</span></a></p>
SPQR<p>Both moments of peak globalization came crashing down, in epochal, generation-defining ways. In 1913 the value of exported goods made up 14 percent of the world economy... The backlash propelled the rise of right-wing authoritarian and fascist movements that promised to reverse or seize control of the forces of globalism. It ended in a catastrophic world war.<br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/history" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>history</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/trade" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>trade</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/nationalism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>nationalism</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/WW3" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WW3</span></a> <br><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/05/opinion/globalization-collapse.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nytimes.com/2025/04/05/opinion</span><span class="invisible">/globalization-collapse.html</span></a></p>
Jason Goroncy<p>'Politics can forge solidarity or stoke resentment; it can build shared worlds or violently implement the will of one man. What matters now is whether we can remember what politics is for—neither endless expansion or efficiency, nor simply the resentment-fueled pursuit of naked self-interest, but the shared project of living together within limits'. – Roger Berkowitz</p><p><a href="https://scholar.social/tags/Economics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Economics</span></a> <a href="https://scholar.social/tags/Imperialism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Imperialism</span></a> <a href="https://scholar.social/tags/Politics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Politics</span></a> <a href="https://scholar.social/tags/Globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Globalization</span></a></p><p><a href="https://hac.bard.edu/amor-mundi/its-political-power-stupid-roger-berkowitz-2025-04-06" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">hac.bard.edu/amor-mundi/its-po</span><span class="invisible">litical-power-stupid-roger-berkowitz-2025-04-06</span></a></p>
Ken Walker :caflag:<p>I wonder whether those folks who have dissed <a href="https://cosocial.ca/tags/freetrade" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>freetrade</span></a> and <a href="https://cosocial.ca/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> over recent years despite the prosperity and poverty reduction it has brought are paying attention now that the orange madman is giving them what they asked for.</p>
GeriAQuin<p><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/isolationism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>isolationism</span></a><br>Hopefully it will not take World War III to get us there. Hopefully we will not end up in a world in which we are further divided, isolated and estranged from one another. Hopefully we will not need to grow potatoes under train tracks or raise goats on our balconies. But it is clear that resolving tensions between globalization and equality is one of the most urgent tasks of our time and that our future rests upon it.</p><p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/05/opinion/globalization-collapse.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nytimes.com/2025/04/05/opinion</span><span class="invisible">/globalization-collapse.html</span></a></p>
Miguel Afonso Caetano<p>"Today, we are facing the possibility of a global system that is not organized by a hegemonic power, in the way that Giovanni Arrighi and many others understood it. The abandonment by the United States of the tools of hegemonic organization does not necessarily mean that another nation-state will take up that mantle. The question appears, then, whether such a nonhegemonic project can be effective and lasting. For now, a centrifugal and conflictive multipolarity seems to be an adequate description of the state of the world. From this perspective, a continuing or even permanent war regime begins to appear as a necessary component of both the organization of the world market and the conditions of capitalist development. The capitalist world has always required violence and dispossession, beyond the “mute compulsion” of economic forces, just as all regimes of capitalist “free trade” have required weapons of dominant states and imperial regimes. One difference of the current conjuncture is that there appears to be no need to legitimize the exercise of force with claims to democratic ideals or civilizing missions. The post-hegemony tendency in the global sphere clearly coincides in these, among other, respects with the increase in the domestic sphere of authoritarian and fascist rule.</p><p>As we suggested above, many of these developments appear to revive classical characteristics of imperialism, with the marriage between vast capitalist monopolies or cartels and the power of dominant states, together with practices of territorial expansion. Today these gigantic capitalist actors are directly political in ways they have not been before. Beyond the political role always played by processes of gigantic accumulation of wealth, indeed, big platforms tend to build basic infrastructures of social and economic life, competing with states and emerging as direct governmental actors. "</p><p><a href="https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/news/the-coming-post-hegemonic-world" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">versobooks.com/blogs/news/the-</span><span class="invisible">coming-post-hegemonic-world</span></a></p><p><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Imperialism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Imperialism</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Globalization</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/WorldMarket" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WorldMarket</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/USA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>USA</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Trump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Trump</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Capitalism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Capitalism</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/China" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>China</span></a></p>
Miguel Afonso Caetano<p>No Globalization Without Representation: U.S. Activists and World Inequality <br>Paul Adler<br>University of Pennsylvania Press</p><p>"How consumer and environmental activists became significant players in U.S. and world politics</p><p>Amid the mass protests of the 1960s, another, less heralded political force arose: public interest progressivism. Led by activists like Ralph Nader, organizations of lawyers and experts worked "inside the system." They confronted corporate power and helped win major consumer and environmental protections. By the late 1970s, some public interest groups moved beyond U.S. borders to challenge multinational corporations. This happened at the same time that neoliberalism, a politics of empowerment for big business, gained strength in the U.S. and around the world.</p><p>No Globalization Without Representation is the story of how consumer and environmental activists became significant players in U.S. and world politics at the twentieth century's close. NGOs like Friends of the Earth and Public Citizen helped forge a progressive coalition that lobbied against the emerging neoliberal world order and in favor of what they called "fair globalization." From boycotting Nestlé in the 1970s to lobbying against NAFTA to the "Battle of Seattle" protests against the World Trade Organization in the 1990s, these groups have made a profound mark.</p><p>This book tells their stories while showing how public interest groups helped ensure that a version of liberalism willing to challenge corporate power did not vanish from U.S. politics. Public interest groups believed that preserving liberalism at home meant confronting attempts to perpetuate conservative policies through global economic rules. No Globalization Without Representation also illuminates how professionalized organizations became such a critical part of liberal activism..."</p><p><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Globalization</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Activism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Activism</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Inequality" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Inequality</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Neoliberalism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Neoliberalism</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AlternativeGlobalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AlternativeGlobalization</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/NAFTA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NAFTA</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/WTO" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WTO</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9780812253177/no-globalization-without-representation/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">pennpress.org/9780812253177/no</span><span class="invisible">-globalization-without-representation/</span></a></p>
Corin Ashwell 🌍 🌿 🍄<p>Probably don't need to reiterate it on lefty Mastodon, but the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Trump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Trump</span></a> tariffs are not so that the working class can get back something stolen from it by <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> but so that the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/rich" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>rich</span></a> &amp; <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/oligarch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>oligarch</span></a> class can avoid having what THEY have stolen reappropriated from them. <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Protectionism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Protectionism</span></a> may have a role in a just <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/economy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>economy</span></a> but that isn't what this is about. It's dividing the international working class to stop it uniting against the super rich</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/inequality" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>inequality</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/limitarianism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>limitarianism</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/politics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>politics</span></a></p>
Script Kiddie<p><strong>The penguins are understandably pissed off.</strong></p> <p><a href="https://anonsys.net/display/bf69967c-3567-f06f-1b6c-ff7257506971" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">anonsys.net/display/bf69967c-3</span><span class="invisible">567-f06f-1b6c-ff7257506971</span></a></p>
Miguel Afonso Caetano<p>"Trump’s crusade to rebalance trade is occurring because the vicious cycle propping up the FIRE sector at the expense of the American people is breaking down. The rise of the multipolar world order disrupts the American oligarchy’s interests. The modernization and economic development of the rest of the world reduces the need for other countries to rely on American imperial hegemony. There are more trade opportunities than ever outside America. Other countries are less reliant on access to American markets, weakening the dollar’s status as reserve currency. </p><p>Any gains for the productive economy from Trump’s tariffs will likely be sabotaged by the FIRE sector’s malinvestment of capital and the foreign-policy establishment’s unwillingness to withdraw from the world. America can’t have its cake (of maintaining the dollar as the global reserve currency) and eat it too (bringing back manufacturing and resolving trade imbalances). The oligarchy cannot be expected to act in America’s best interests, because that is at the expense of its interests. </p><p>Ending the rule of the American oligarchy would require reductions of military spending, ending proxy conflicts, closing bases, and embracing diplomacy. For the FIRE sector, this would entail taxing financial transactions, using central bank window guidance, and establishing a national development bank to direct investment into productive sectors and not to asset price inflation. Tariff policy wouldn’t be used as a retaliatory action, but as a targeted and measured policy tool for incubating critical domestic industries."</p><p><a href="https://www.compactmag.com/article/liberating-america-requires-more-than-tariffs/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">compactmag.com/article/liberat</span><span class="invisible">ing-america-requires-more-than-tariffs/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/USA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>USA</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Trump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Trump</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Tariffs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Tariffs</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Financialization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Financialization</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Globalization</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/FreeTrade" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FreeTrade</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Protectionism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Protectionism</span></a></p>
Miguel Afonso Caetano<p>"In summary, the first globalization saw the rise of the West, the second the rise of Asia; the first led to an increase of between-country inequalities, the second to their decline. Both globalizations tended to increase inequalities within nations. The unevenness of countries’ growth rates during Globalization I installed most of the Western populations at the top of the global income pyramid. It is rarely recognized just how highly placed even the poor deciles of the rich countries were in the global income distribution. Economist Paul Collier, in his Future of Capitalism, writes wistfully of the time when English workers were on top of the world. But for them to feel high, somebody else had to feel low.</p><p>The second globalization drove some of the Western middle classes from these perches and produced a great reshuffling of incomes as they were overtaken by a rising Asia. This relatively imperceptible decline occurred together with the Western middle classes’ far more perceptible one with respect to their own national elites. It caused political dissatisfaction that found its reflection in the rise of populist leaders and parties.</p><p>Finally, we should note that the convergence of worldwide incomes did not extend to Africa, which continued on its path of relative decline. If that is not changed — and the likelihood of such change seems low — the relative decline of Africa will, in the decades to come, overturn the forces currently pushing global inequality downward and usher in a new era of rising global inequality."</p><p><a href="https://jacobin.com/2025/03/what-comes-after-globalization/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">jacobin.com/2025/03/what-comes</span><span class="invisible">-after-globalization/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Globalization</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Neoliberalism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Neoliberalism</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Inequality" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Inequality</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Poverty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Poverty</span></a></p>
Linknation<p>well yes <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/donaltrump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>donaltrump</span></a> just as his predecessor mostly care about <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/money" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>money</span></a> </p><p>so when <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> (u know selling companies off to foreign countries mostly <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/China" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>China</span></a> dismantling whole factories shipping them to <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/China" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>China</span></a>) was good <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/money" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>money</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/economic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>economic</span></a> policy of <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/USA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>USA</span></a> was <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> </p><p>now <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/China" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>China</span></a> won that game</p><p>so now <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/USA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>USA</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/America" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>America</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/TheWest" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TheWest</span></a> realizes: this game SUCKS (ok told u 30 years ago but whatever)</p><p>and try to turn back the wheel to the 1960s if they turn too far we might end up in 1933</p><p>nothing get's build anymore in <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/USA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>USA</span></a> except sometimes a great song like this <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/trump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>trump</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/song" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>song</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/music" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>music</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/lol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>lol</span></a></p>
Enalys :enalys:<p>As a lefty of a certain age who griw up during globalization, I don't know how to stance with these Trump tariffs stuff.</p><p>Since the 80's, we know that free trades agreements could be – and in fact were – hurtful and destructive to countries, there economy and population, and they always were criticized by the left (Remember the Seattle protests of 1999?).<br>But I don't think going “Full Tariffs on everything with war mongering in bonus” like Trump does is the solution to deglobilize the economy.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.zergy.net/tags/USPol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>USPol</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.zergy.net/tags/Globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Globalization</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.zergy.net/tags/WTO" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WTO</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.zergy.net/tags/Canada" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Canada</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.zergy.net/tags/Tariff" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Tariff</span></a></p>
Cairo Braga [toot]<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@blogdiva" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>blogdiva</span></a></span> <a href="https://toot.cairobraga.com/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> is, indeed, the world-scope colonial fascist project of the US-American Empire (Americans are all of us from the whole continent, it bears repeating).</p>
your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦<p>BTW i would like y’all to start speaking about <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> as a <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/fascist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>fascist</span></a> American project. </p><p>globalization is the worldwide normalization of American <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/corporatist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>corporatist</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/fascism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>fascism</span></a>. </p><p>business suits are the new <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/nazi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>nazi</span></a> suits. the Silicon Valley aesthetics of khakis is the new <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/brownshirts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>brownshirts</span></a>. cop uniforms are the new <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/blackshirts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>blackshirts</span></a>. </p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/aesthetics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>aesthetics</span></a> play a huge part in normalizing violence; especially state <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/violence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>violence</span></a>.</p>
War on the Castle, Peace in the Valley🛡️🍉🇵🇸 🏳️‍🌈I've been reflecting on recent news suggesting that Trump may be considering the creation of an autarky—a self-sufficient economy that minimizes international trade. Historically, attempts at autarky have often led to significant economic setbacks. For instance, Stalin’s Soviet Union faced severe inefficiencies and shortages due to its isolationist policies. Similarly, North Korea’s self-reliance strategy has resulted in economic distress and humanitarian crises. Isolating ourselves in today’s interconnected world could backfire in ways that deepen inequality and undermine social progress. I invite your insights on this. How do we counter this trend and advocate for a more collaborative global economy? . 🌍💬 #Trump #Autarky #EconomicHistory #Globalization
your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦<p>6. it’s weird that i have known since forever of the Catholic penchant for burning “sinful” objects ―especially books and arts― but it didn’t occur to me that BONFIRES OF THE VANITIES were actual events that had taken place all across Europe, in response to different stages of <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> thru commerce not just war.</p><p>Riello mentions the most infamous Hoguera De Las Vanidades, the one officiated by Girolamo Savonarola in 1497. <br><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonfire_of_the_vanities" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonfire_</span><span class="invisible">of_the_vanities</span></a> </p><p>that 1497 caught my eye…</p>
your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦<p>4. so <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/fashion" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>fashion</span></a> in Europe, is not just about the popular modes of dress among localities. as goods flood Europe from what i call the first <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> , european oligarchies scrambled to make it impossible for their serfs and the growing merchant classes, to have the capacity to buy and show off goods that would make them look equal or better than them. </p><p>engineered poverty and fashion go hand in hand.</p><p>and to create poverty you need cops: in 1300s Europe there were actual <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/fashion" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>fashion</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/police" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>police</span></a> …</p>
Marcial Tenreiro-Bermudez<p>Archaeoethnologica: Bronzization - Book / Bronzização - Livro</p><p>+INFO in: <a href="https://archaeoethnologica.blogspot.com/2025/02/bronzinizacao.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">archaeoethnologica.blogspot.co</span><span class="invisible">m/2025/02/bronzinizacao.html</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Archaeology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Archaeology</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/protohistory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>protohistory</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/BronzeAge" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>BronzeAge</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Scandinavia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Scandinavia</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/CentralEurope" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CentralEurope</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Mediterranean" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mediterranean</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Scandinavia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Scandinavia</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/BritishIsles" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>BritishIsles</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/culturalcontact" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>culturalcontact</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/globalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>globalization</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/books" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>books</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/openaccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>openaccess</span></a></p>