Nemo_bis 🌈<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@wchr" class="u-url mention">@<span>wchr</span></a></span> The quoted sentence from <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/01/eff-tells-supreme-court-user-speech-must-be-protected" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">eff.org/deeplinks/2023/01/eff-</span><span class="invisible">tells-supreme-court-user-speech-must-be-protected</span></a> is puzzling but it's commenting a hypothetical scenario where the changes are major: «substantive claims related to how their systems recommend, promote, rank, arrange, or otherwise display content posted by their users».<br /><a href="https://www.eff.org/files/2023/01/19/21-1333_amicus_brief.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">eff.org/files/2023/01/19/21-13</span><span class="invisible">33_amicus_brief.pdf</span></a></p><p>It's a scenario where misconfiguring your site's <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/Lucene" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Lucene</span></a> is a legal liability.</p><p>On the broader point, we still don't know that <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/YouTube" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>YouTube</span></a> causes <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/radicalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>radicalization</span></a>.<br /><a href="https://www.techdirt.com/2021/11/03/whole-youtube-radicalizes-people-story-doesnt-seem-to-have-much-evidence-to-back-it-up/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">techdirt.com/2021/11/03/whole-</span><span class="invisible">youtube-radicalizes-people-story-doesnt-seem-to-have-much-evidence-to-back-it-up/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/Section230" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Section230</span></a></p>