mamot.fr is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mamot.fr est un serveur Mastodon francophone, géré par La Quadrature du Net.

Server stats:

3.1K
active users

#dataownership

1 post1 participant0 posts today

Selhosted P2P E2EE File Transfer & Messaging PWA

* #OpenSource
* #CrossPlatform
* #PWA
* #iOS, #Android, #Desktop (self compile)
* App store, Play store (coming soon)
* Desktop
* #Windows, #MacOS, #Linux (self compile)
* run `index.html` on any modern #browser
* #Decentralized
* #Secure
* #NoCookies
* #P2P #encrypted
* No registration
* No installing
* #Messaging
* Group Messaging (coming soon)
* Text Messaging
* #Multimedia Messaging
* #Screensharing (on desktop browsers)
* Offline Messaging (in #research phase)
* #FileTransfer
* #VideoCalls
* #DataOwnership
* #SelfHosted
* GitHub pages Hosting
* #LocalOnly storage

Check it out!

positive-intentions.com

(Degoogled links to the apps)
- Chat: chat.positive-intentions.com
- File: file.positive-intentions.com
- GitHub: github.com/positive-intentions

I've build a stack for an open productive environment 🚀

- Core (MariaDB, PostgreSQL, Adminer und Traefik)
- Website: Drupal
- Version control: Gitlab
- Mail: Mailcow
- Drive: Nextcloud
- Office: OnlyOffice
- Project management: OpenProject
- Notes: Hedgedoc

It needs 6cores-16GB-RAM-something to run 🏃

If this works out: good bye github, google, onedrive, msoffice!

gitlab.nasarek.dev/rnsrk/open-

GitLabRobert Nasarek / Open Productive Stack · GitLabGitLab Community Edition

This morning, I was on the phone with a potential client, and I suggested they migrate to a NextCloud solution instead of their current cloud provider. When I explained that one of the main reasons, in my opinion, is to remain the owner of their own data, they reacted ironically, saying that at that point, people like me would have access to all their data. They seemed less worried about a large cloud provider than about a company "closer" to them.

I explained that they could encrypt everything, but they weren’t entirely convinced.

We parted ways on good terms, but with little hope.

Two hours later, they called me back. They did some research and asked a few colleagues. They’re now considering the idea and even apologized for the joke.

There was nothing to apologize for; it's just that some dynamics can be unclear (especially since we're so used to the promises of salespeople, often far from reality).

Selhosted P2P E2EE File Transfer & Messaging PWA

positive-intentions.com

A p2p encrypted file transfer and messaging app. Here are some features below:

* #OpenSource
* #CrossPlatform
* #PWA
* #iOS, #Android, #Desktop (self compile)
* App store, Play store (coming soon)
* Desktop
* #Windows, #MacOS, #Linux (self compile)
* run `index.html` on any modern #browser
* #Decentralized
* #Secure
* #NoCookies
* #P2P #encrypted
* No registration
* No installing
* #Messaging
* Group Messaging (coming soon)
* Text Messaging
* #Multimedia Messaging
* #Screensharing (on desktop browsers)
* Offline Messaging (in #research phase)
* #FileTransfer
* #VideoCalls
* #DataOwnership
* #SelfHosted
* GitHub pages Hosting
* #LocalOnly storage

Check it out!

(Degoogled links to the apps)
- Chat: chat.positive-intentions.com
- File: file.positive-intentions.com
- GitHub: github.com/positive-intentions

positive-intentions.compositive-intentions | positive-intentionsDescription will go into a meta tag in <head />

One of the things I've been advocating for years - and where I want to raise my voice even louder - is the importance of owning your data. #OwnYourData

Over the past few days, I’ve come across two examples of how misinformation is causing immense damage, leading people to believe that there's no alternative but to hand over their data to big corporations, putting themselves entirely in their hands.

- A well-known lawyer, just before a meeting, warned about using Teams and its new "virtual assistant," which joins conferences before anyone else and transcribes everything. When I pointed out that it would be wise to use alternative tools (like Jitsi, for example, but there are others), he abruptly ended the conversation, saying, "We've lost this war. There's no alternative anymore."
That wasn’t the right moment for a detailed discussion, so I just noted that alternatives do exist - but if no one starts using them, and if we passively accept certain behaviors from certain companies, things will never improve for us.

- Just now, I received another one of those emails that hurt more in the heart than in the wallet: "Our e-commerce is taking off, so we’re moving it to Shopify to better manage our growth."
I replied, trying to explain that handing over a growing e-commerce business to a third-party company (right now, they have full access to their own server - meaning all their databases, data, etc., are under their control) means losing ownership of it. Prices could change at any moment, contract terms could shift negatively, and, worst case scenario, if Shopify itself faced issues (which seems impossible today, but think of giants like Kodak), they could lose everything. Of course, they’ll do what they think is best, but I feel obligated to warn them.

Luckily, others are making the opposite choice. But I keep wondering: since these big platforms aren’t exactly cheap, rather than "selling themselves" to them just for (potentially) fewer headaches, wouldn’t it be worth paying someone (not me, of course, but someone working exclusively for them) to handle these things - ensuring they retain full ownership of their business and their data?

Selhosted P2P E2EE File Transfer & Messaging PWA

positive-intentions.com

A p2p encrypted file transfer and messaging app. Here are some features below:

* #OpenSource
* #CrossPlatform
* #PWA
* #iOS, #Android, #Desktop (self compile)
* App store, Play store (coming soon)
* Desktop
* #Windows, #MacOS, #Linux (self compile)
* run `index.html` on any modern #browser
* #Decentralized
* #Secure
* #NoCookies
* #P2P #encrypted
* No registration
* No installing
* #Messaging
* Group Messaging (coming soon)
* Text Messaging
* #Multimedia Messaging
* #Screensharing (on desktop browsers)
* Offline Messaging (in #research phase)
* #FileTransfer
* #VideoCalls
* #DataOwnership
* #SelfHosted
* GitHub pages Hosting
* #LocalOnly storage

Check it out!

(Degoogled links to the apps)
- Chat: chat.positive-intentions.com
- File: file.positive-intentions.com
- GitHub: github.com/positive-intentions

positive-intentions.compositive-intentions | positive-intentionsDescription will go into a meta tag in <head />

Well, another one.

@vincent@r.town is running bird.makeup.

Somehow that's still live.

Issues:
1. The agreement between Xitter users and Xitter doesn't include his platform as a party authorized to process user data.
2. Data being public doesn't authorize him (or anyone else) to use and process that data outside of fair use.
3. Consent, at the moment, is opt-out (by blocking the bridge), rather than opt-in on the user side.

These issues have been brought up twice already:
-
https://todo.sr.ht/~cloutier/bird.makeup/9
-
https://todo.sr.ht/~cloutier/bird.makeup/14

As of January 18 2025, bird.makeup has the following metrics:
- Followers (i.e. people following Twitter accounts, to my understanding): 101 790
- Followers' servers: 4479
- Connections (Twitter <> Fedi): 471 450 (!)
- Connections (Instagram <> Fedi): 2 758
- Twitter users: 152 862
- Instagram users: 1459

Furthermore, bird.makeup offers
zero terms of service, privacy policy, or any hint at what their data processing practices are.

In short: it's nearly the same bullshit that we saw with Bridgy-Fed, where the
ability to do something is more enticing to the dev than ethics.

But here's the kicker: someone
did already request that their account be deleted. You know what @vincent@r.town said?

~cloutier REPORTED -> NOT_OUR_BUG 1 year, 11 months ago
Twitter sells data to anyone who wants them. You don’t own your tweets. People should delete their Twitter account if they are not comfortable with that
(The screenshot is that same response.)

Let's break it down:

1. He claims Twitter sells user data to anyone. Okay, let's assume this is true, since there's precedent for Elon to do that.
2. He claims that you don't own your tweets. That's
very false and disingenuous. You do own your data. And even if you didn't, @vincent@r.town isn't party to your agreement with Twitter and thus doesn't have license or authorization to use or process your data outside the scope of Twitter (barring fair use, which bridging isn't).
3. He then proceeds to say that the user should proceed to delete their twitter account if they're not comfortable with that.

Now my question is, with what?

1/2



#fediverse #consent #privacy #dataprivacy #dataownership

RE:
https://fed.bajsicki.com/notes/a23cjpezn0

Should be a law: if you run a web app that stores user data behind a login, you are required either to allow users to scrape their data (no anti-scraping tech blocking authenticated users) or to provide an API they can use to access it at no additional charge.
It should literally be illegal to lock users data into your site and prevent them from implementing their own automation to access it.
#tech #web #dataOwnership #dataRights

"…social networking through protocols like ActivityPub, which powers platforms like Mastodon and Pixelfed. These federated systems demonstrate how decentralized networks can achieve global scale while preserving local autonomy, an alternative to centralized social media, where users can choose their communities, set their rules, and maintain ownership of their digital presence."

joanwestenberg.com/the-revolut

westenberg. · The Revolution Will Be DecentralizedPower once flowed directly from “divine right”. Medieval Europe operated under a simple premise / lie: God appointed kings, kings appointed nobles, and the rest served. This hierarchical system persisted for centuries until merchants began accumulating wealth that rivaled aristocratic fortunes; the rise of banking houses like the Medici in Florence

Selhosted P2P File Transfer & Messaging PWA

App: chat.positive-intentions.com

A p2p encrypted file transfer and messaging app. Here are some features below:

* #OpenSource
* #CrossPlatform
* #PWA
* #iOS, #Android, #Desktop (self compile)
* App store, Play store (coming soon)
* Desktop
* #Windows, #MacOS, #Linux (self compile)
* run `index.html` on any modern #browser
* #Decentralized
* #Secure
* #NoCookies
* #P2P #encrypted
* No registration
* No installing
* #Messaging
* Group Messaging (coming soon)
* Text Messaging
* #Multimedia Messaging
* #Screensharing (on desktop browsers)
* Offline Messaging (in #research phase)
* #FileTransfer
* #VideoCalls
* #DataOwnership
* #SelfHosted
* GitHub pages Hosting
* Local-Only storage

Check it out!

- App: chat.positive-intentions.com
- More info: positive-intentions.com/blog/i
- GitHub: github.com/positive-intentions

chat.positive-intentions.compositive-intentions

im aiming to create an #encrypted #secure and #private #messaging app. (because thats the only type worth working on)

I've highlighted some features below:

- #Decentralized
- #P2P
- #encrypted
- #DataOwnership
- #Serverless with #SelfHosting
- PWA, iOS, Android, Desktop
- #OpenSource

Check it out!
GitHub: github.com/positive-intentions
Demo: chat.positive-intentions.com
Blog: positive-intentions.com/blog/i

p.s. let me know if im spamming on your feed. im trying to guage the reccommended quality and frequency of posting on mastodon.

Decentralized chat. Contribute to positive-intentions/chat development by creating an account on GitHub.
GitHubGitHub - positive-intentions/chat: Decentralized chatDecentralized chat. Contribute to positive-intentions/chat development by creating an account on GitHub.

while it's nice that #mastodon is technically #decentralized, it's important to be aware of the limitations. for example, there is a feature to migrate your account to another instance, but *your posts do not come with you.* while there is a separate feature to export your posts, there is no way to import them.

a request to "Support post migration" has been around and discussed for more than five years, currently stalled on some technic decision-making that leadership doesn't appear to be actively interested in: github.com/mastodon/mastodon/i

nor are there are any public plans to move forward on this: joinmastodon.org/roadmap

since that issue was created, there have been multiple high-profile instance shutdowns, even of big-name instances. i am concerned that these sorts of problems can and will - over time - discourage folks from taking a chance on anything but the biggest, best-funded instances, and reduce effective user choice. does this sound like a familiar pattern to anybody?

GitHubSupport Post Migration · Issue #12423 · mastodon/mastodonBy SilverWolf32