It's strange to hear that maintainers of free software projects could be simply "appointed" like this, and regardless of the fact that it is (allegedly) RMS, it sounds strange in itself and shows there is a problem. What does it mean in practice? Commit access?
If Mark "appointed" himself, that is even more strange.
I thought it was the sole responsibility of the current maintainers.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!