Here's something weird: in the wake of Roe v Wade in the 1970s, the Southern Baptist Convention repeatedly passed resolutions affirming the right to abortion and rejecting government interference in the decision to bear a child to term:

Back then, white evangelicals were deeply suspicious of people who opposed abortion. Getting too worked up about the issue was a sign of crypto-papacy, and back then, white evangelicals *hated* Catholics:


The weirdest thing about this is that today, white evangelicals will vote for *anyone* who promise to end abortion - even a philandering, foul-mouthed, unprincipled habitual liar and likely atheist. They are single-issue voters - whose single issue is something that, in living memory, they actually opposed.


They'll vote for politicians like Scott Dejarlais, the GOP congressghoul from Tennessee who was re-elected three times. Dejarlais, an MD, impregnated one of his patients, then coerced her into getting an abortion. He also coerced his ex-wife into getting two abortions. But he reliably voted to ban abortion:

Dejarlais "received a 100% score by the National Right to Life Committee."



If you've seen the polling on abortion, you know that these single-issue voters are in a tiny and generally unimportant minority. Americans overwhelmingly support the right to get an abortion. And yet, here we are. Obviously, America is a nation founded on antimajoritarian principles, whose Constitution is designed to let rural, southern gentry steer the nation, but is it really *that* antimajoritarian?


· · Web · 1 · 1 · 2

Not really. The GOP is a coalition of single-issue voters, and substantial numbers of the GOP base are actually pretty cool with abortion - they're pursuing *other* single issues, and they're willing to give up abortion in exchange for progress on their pet issues.


Another critical bloc in the GOP coalition is people with low-tax brain-worms, including many self-described "libertarians," who will vote for unlimited authoritarianism and state intrusion into the most private realm of (other) people's lives, provided that they save at least 25 cents on their tax bill as a result:


These two blocs, along with racists, homophobes and transphobes, provide the bulk for the master strategists of the GOP, people who aren't merely elitists, but actual *elites*. By definition, elite politics can't win majorities on its own, because elites are always in the minority - that's what "elite" means.


The cruelty isn't the point. The cruelty is a means to an end. The cruelty is how you mobilize useful idiots to turn out to the polls and vote for the vast expansion of the wealth of a tiny number of people. The cruelty is how you get the turkeys to vote for Christmas:


An oft-repeated truism about abortion restrictions is that they don't affect wealthy people who can afford to miss work and travel out of state. Some argue with this, pointing out that being merely wealthy won't save you if you need an emergency D&C after a miscarriage, say.


That's true as far as it goes, but there's a group of people for whom this is much less true: the ultra-rich, the 1% and (especially) the 0.1%. These are people whose wealth allows them to bend reality - to charter private jets, or to have private doctors fly to them on private jets. People who have their names on hospital wings.


The defining characteristic of these people is *impunity*, the power to do as they like without consequence, to bypass the rules, laws and challenges of the rest of us. These are the people building luxury bunkers in New Zealand and whose only concern about civilizational collapse is the logistics of coercing their private goons in the Great After:


Dobbs, the case that overturned Roe v Wade, was decided by an illegitimate court whose appointees were nominated and confirmed by politicians who lost the popular election. The illegitimate Supremes are the apex of a vast cohort of federal judges who were likewise appointed by politicians who lost the popular vote:


These judges have emitted a steady stream of unhinged, cruel decisions on culture-war issues, and these have real, human consequences. But it's a mistake to assume the reason that billionaires put so much energy into getting these judges appointed was to strike down New York's concealed carry law. That was -a means to an end, a way to get turkeys to vote for Xmas (there are a lot of musket-fucking single-issue ammosexual voters who will vote for anyone who makes it easier to get guns).


The reasons so much money was poured into the elections that resulted in these judges' lifetime appointments to the federal bench were economic, not cultural. These are judges who will reliably rule in corporations' favor, whether they have maimed their workers, poisoned our planet, price-gouged the public, or killed us with unsafe products. They will wave through mergers that the FTC or DOJ have blocked. They will make extremely rich people *much* richer.


These judges will put Black and poor people in jail, sure - and that will make the Christmas-voting turkeys happy. But just as importantly, they'll let millionaires escape consequences, no matter how heinous their crimes.

Whether it's getting drunk and mowing down four people:

Or raping a teenager:

Or hell, raping a *baby*:


The cruelty isn't the point, power is: the power to use other people in cruel ways, to be sure, but also the power to float above other people's pain, sorrow and concern. The rich dream of a world where "personal responsibility" is code for "total lack of empathy."


Subverting the legislature and the judiciary is an iterative process: first you buy some politicians who pass favorable laws and appoint favorable judges; then those judges rule in your favor when those laws are called into question. That makes you richer, which lets you buy more politicians, who pass more laws and appoint more judges.


As Bill Clinton - who used his strong majority in both chambers of Congress to get NAFTA passed, smashing unions, but not to turn the right to an abortion into a federal law - liked to remind us: "It's the economy, stupid."

The stupid economy just keeps getting stupider. The rich have gotten *so much richer* and each surging transfer of wealth from our teeming millions to their board-room handful has been attended by more political power for America's oligarchs.


The iterative buy-laws-buy-judges-buy-judgements process crossed an important threshold in 2010, when ultrawealthy backers secured their *Citizens United* SCOTUS decision, which freed them up to make unlimited, secret campaign contributions to politicians who would make them richer and thus able to buy more politicians.


Citizens United was key to the election of the pols who gave us the illegitimate Supreme Court who, in turn, gave us the Dobbs decision and despite the prominence of Dobbs in our national discourse (and its importance to pregnant people and the children they are forced to bear), there's plenty that SCOTUS is doing that is equally terrifying. The Supreme Court of Oligarchs is primarily concerned with elite impunity and power, not cruelty - the cruelty is merely the means, power is the end.


One extremely relatable way of understanding elite impunity is the tax evasion of the ultra-rich. A year ago, Propublica began reporting on the IRS Files, leaks detailing the tax strategies of the 0.1%.

The oligarchs whose finances were thus exposed are all heavy political spenders. Unsurprisingly, they lobbied hard for tax breaks in the Trump tax bill, and received incredibly specific tax loopholes that applied to just one or two very rich donors.


Bechtel spent $1m getting one such loophole, and netted $111m in return - a shrewd investment indeed:

The most revolting GOP politicians - the ones who are forever in the news for their authoritarianism and bigotry - have been *showered* with money by billionaires, including self-styled "progressives." These billionaires are the true single-issue voters, because their single issue is *themselves*:


Many of these high-rolling donors got rich by being born rich, and boy do they hate inheritance tax. They argue that the ability to steer our whole society - to steer our ecosystem off a planetary cliff - should be allocated on the basis of whether you emerged from a very lucky orifice:


Show newer

@pluralistic I'd spent time looking for a good description of the dynamic I was seeing ever more often in politics: power for power's sake.

Eric Blair, of course:

“The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?”

That's today's GOP/GQP. Or Torrys (uk). Or AFD (de). Or RN/FN (fr).

@pluralistic I'm increasingly convinced that impunity and immunity are two of the greatest problems facing the world.

Certainly major themes of your work in past years.

But yes this.

@pluralistic This is such a mindblowing observation: Ultimately, politics is about gaining and keeping in power. Bigotry is no end in itself, it is just a means by elites to control an allegiance of believers.

@olav @pluralistic

Mindblowing perhaps, but certainly not new. Ever read Machiavelli?

There are two kinds of leaders: those who set a goal and convince others to follow them towards it and those who figure out where some crowd wants to go and then get in front yelling, "Follow me!"

And, all too often, those crowds want cruelty and feel hate…

The 2nd kind of leader are called 'Populists' for a reason. The history of the Roman Republic and it's turn towards Empire is instructive.

@olav @pluralistic

The thing about Populism is, it works as an avenue to power whether your own desires align with the crowd or not – because the crowd believes what they want to believe.

The downside of populism is, eventually the crowd turns against you once you've exhausted the levels of cruelty you can apply to appease them and still remain in power.

The Nazis knew this and destroyed their own support network once they had locked in power. Look up, "Night of the Long Knives."

@olav @pluralistic

Additional note: Above, by 'locked in power', I mean the Nazis reached a deal with the existing elites that let them do what they wanted. But to make that deal work the Brownshirts had to go.

And that's the part the red-hatted crowd doesn't understand. Because, for every Trump there is a McConnell.

@pluralistic The elitists are all left-wing, not right-wing.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
La Quadrature du Net - Mastodon - Media Fédéré est un serveur Mastodon francophone, géré par La Quadrature du Net.