Since the start of this century, small and mid-sized towns have courted big box stores, using tax revenues to fund expensive road, sewer and electric expansions to lure large corporate chains to town.
These companies promised jobs and tax revenues, and, *technically* speaking, they delivered both, but only if you do some very funny math. National chains pay little or no federal income tax, and often secure state tax abatements.
This gives them a 30-40% advantage over small, homegrown businesses operated by locals who can't afford the huge sums needed to pay corrupt tax-experts to establish fictional headquarters on offshore financial secrecy haves.
Large national chains also have commanding bargaining power when they negotiate with suppliers, which means they pay less for their merchandise than locally owned businesses.
Given tax and purchasing advantages, the arrival of a big box store doesn't *really* create jobs. Sure, they hire locals to work in their stores, but at the cost of a boarded-up main street where the only businesses that survive are dollar stores.
When a local government spends public funds to lure in a big box store, they actually *cost* the town net jobs, and the funds they spend to kill those jobs come from the workers whose jobs were lost and the businesses that provided those jobs.
But at least big boxes pay local taxes, right?
In Michigan, Lowes pioneered an aggressive tactic of lowering its tax bills. It's called the "dark store" gambit, and it's so successful that towns are refunding *millions* to big box stores.
In her breakdown for ILSR, Olivia LaVecchia explains how the "dark store" hustle works. First, a big box store files an appeal on its tax assessment, arguing that the town or county have overvalued its property.
Big box stores are built to order, heavily customized to the retailer's specific requirements. They are designed to be fast to erect and disposable, and when they are put up for sale, restrictive covenants are added to the deed to block a competitor from moving in.
These restrictions are incredibly specific (and restrictive), listing individual items that may never be sold by anyone who buys the property, for the rest of time.
Unsurprisingly, the resale value of a cheaply built, white-elephant structure that can't be used to sell common items is very, very low. Lowe's argues that the taxes on its property should reflect this incredibly low valuation.
That's how the Lowe's in Marquette, MI retroactively slashed the assessed value of the store it built for $10m from $5.2m to $2.4m (in 2010), $2m (in 2011) and $1.5m (in 2012).
Based on the new assessment, Marquette was on the hook to refund $755,828 to Lowe's, a company with $50b in net annual sales.
To pay for the refund, Marquette slashed its library, police and fire-department budgets.
Lowe's is a trailblazer. After a corporate-friendly state tax tribunal and supreme court sided with Lowe's 12 more big-box stores in Marquette appealed their historical tax assessments, seeking comparable refunds from the city.
Marquette isn't an outlier. Ottawa City, MI is on the hook to refund $14.8m to its big box parasites. Statewide, the "dark store" gambit has netted $47m, so far - and it's spreading to Indiana, with Meijer hitting Marion County, IN for $2.4m.
Indiana is projecting a $120m tax shortfall for towns and counties as "dark store" reassessments sweep the state. Big box stores already destroy local businesses and jobs and erode the local tax-base, but it's about to get *much* worse.
Thanks to the sky-high costs they impose on local governments, big box stores *already* cost municipalities $0.44/sqft/year ($80k/year for a Walmart Supercenter). That's *before* dark-store reassessment.
The myth of big box prosperity sent money gushing out of the public spigots: by 2014, big boxes had sucked up more than $2.4b in direct subsidies from local governments.
The dark-store hustle has all the hallmarks of a long con. In a long con, the crook lets the mark win a little money at first, as a convincer. Then, having lulled the mark into complacency, the crook takes them for everything.
Local governments were able to pretend that somehow these big boxes would make up for the costs they imposed and the losses they triggered, because of the local tax bills they paid. That kept the subsidies and favors flowing.
Now that local governments are on their last legs, battered by the covid slump and anti-tax extremists in state government that cut spending, the fraudsters pull their switch, clawing back all the taxes they paid as convincers and setting themselves up for a tax-free future.
City of Westminster Archives Centre (modified)
Mike Mozart (modified)
Well, it's just the ability of creating much more turnover with less personnel, which makes those companies strong. We must face the truth, as is in Germany. Just 4 corporations make up the grocery market. They're going to devorate even non-food standards markets. Anything special soon only will be sold by Amazon and similar.
Distribution is not productive. It's a large cost factor, they always will try to minimize.
There is no escape from laws of economy.
Mamot.fr est une serveur Mastodon francophone, géré par La Quadrature du Net.