@ploum Why couldn't we have done it this way from the beginning? Was it not technologically feasible, or were the people building the existing social media silos so lacking in imagination that they couldn't imagine charging people to follow, keeping a small cut for themselves, and giving most of the money to the people getting followed?
@chr @Gargron @starbreaker @ploum I like the idea of hiding follower counts, anything to cut down on that sweet, sweet dopamine rush. But I really wouldn't want to use a social media ecosystem that required payment for following people. I'd rather have people post random stuff that interests and delights them than try to optimize for popularity.
@Azure @ploum @starbreaker @Gargron @chr Worthwhile noting there's an open bug report for this, https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/754 "Thoughts on not showing a followers/following number?"
For anyone interested, might be worthwhile giving the issue a thumbs-up, or otherwise contributing to it if you have the time.
I agree that this would be a very strong move. It means building something very very different than what exist today. It's a choice. Either Mastodon wants to be a free/decentralised replacement of Twittter or it wants to be something new.
Neither is good or bad, it's a matter of choice.
Bienvenue dans le media fédéré de la Quadrature du Net association de défense des libertés. Les inscriptions sont ouvertes et libres.
Tout compte créé ici pourra a priori discuter avec l'ensemble des autres instances de Mastodon de la fédération, et sera visible sur les autres instances.
Nous maintiendrons cette instance sur le long terme.