Problems we are having with #Signal:
* It is and will remain centralized (clear strategy of *not* federating servers)
* It requires strong identifiers/selectors (phone#) to use
* Author disallows distribution by anyone but Google, although free/libre
* It keeps pushing away verification of fingerprint in interface
* It relies on Google+Amazon infrastructure
* Its funding is shady (OTF = Radio Free Asia = USG)
= clearly unethical choices, unjustifiable by accessibility or technological reasons.
@suetanvil I wish we stop attempting at justifying the ethically/morally unacceptable by "usability". this notion considers that "users" (not people eh!) are all idiots, incapable of doing what the person mentioning it is capable of.
It is by infantilizing people that they end up being subjugated, under control.
My own field experience of sec is that when u make people understand (activists, journalists doing real journalism, sources, etc.) they are capable of making efforts (tails, GPG, etc.)
Have you succeeded in training anyone without a secondary-school degree in the use of GPG? Because withholding quality education from the poor is one of the tactics in wide use against the US poor.
Would you get my mother to use something harder than signal?
I tried to make her use it but she said some of her contacts did not receive messages.
I mean she did not really care about privacy or crypting messages. So she went back to her standard app after switching phone.
Standards users will not make the effort to understand something more difficult than what Google teaches them.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!